DONNA L. SCHWARTZER AND ALBERT SCHWARTZER AND ARTHUR POKORNY, APPELLANTS,
v.
ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1969-01-14
No. 68-679
Before PEARSON, BARKDULL and HENDRY, JJ.
217 So. 2d 843 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1969) Negative Treatment
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

This appeal presents the same issue which has previously been dealt with in Ringenberger v. General Accident F. & L. Assur. Corp., Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 376; Sellers v. Government Employees Insurance Co., Fla.App.1968, 214 So.2d 879; and Morrison Assurance Company, Inc. v. Polak, Fla.App.1968, 216 So.2d 484 (opinion filed in this court December 17, 1968).

In the last cited decision we followed the reasoning set forth in the Sellers decision and noted possible conflict with the Ringenberger decision. Appellee has unsuccessfully attempted to distinguish the present case from the Sellers case. We therefore reverse the declaratory judgment on the authority of the Sellers and Morrison decisions.

Reversed and remanded with directions to enter judgment for the appellants.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Allstate Ins. Co. v. Schwartzer, 234 So. 2d 102 (Fla. 1970)
    …PER CURIAM. This cause is before us on petition for writ of certiorari to review the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 217 So. 2d 843, which opinion is as follows: “PER CURIAM. “This appeal presents the same issue which has previously been dealt with in Ringenberger v. General Accident F. & L. Assur. Corp., Fla.App. 1968, 214 So. 2d 376; Sellers v. Government Employees Insurance…
  • Schwartzer v. Allstate Ins. Co., 239 So. 2d 82 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)
    …PER CURIAM. Whereas, the judgment of this court was entered on January 14, 1969 (217 So. 2d 843) reversing the order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, Florida, in the above styled cause; and Whereas, on review of this court’s judgment, by certiorari, the Supreme Court of Florida, by its opinion and judgment filed April 15, 1970 (234 So. 2d…
  • G.D. v. State, 828 So. 2d 1075 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002)
    …oubt.” However, “totality of the circumstances” is not a burden of proof, and the judge’s use of that phrase does not demonstrate that he used a lesser standard, but merely considered all of the evidence and circumstances. See, e.g., Sokol v. State, 217 So. 2d 843, 844 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969). Affirmed. WARNER, STEVENSON and TAYLOR, JJ., concur.…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw