PETTY

v.

NEW YORK

Citator

Cited By (33 total)

• United States v. Morales, 868 F.2d 1562 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …s of Criminal Procedure 8(b) and 14. We consider these claims individually because they must be evaluated under different standards. Initially we note, as in United States v. Andrews, 765 F. 2d 1491, 1497 n. 1 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied sub nom., 474 U.S. 1064, 106 S.Ct. 815, 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986): There is a threshold question as to whether this claim should be considered to be a Rule 8(b) claim or a Rule 14 claim, given the fact that the determinative event (the dismissal of the conspiracy claim) occur…
• United States v. Lankford, 955 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …an important function of the Sixth Amendment right to cross-examination. Id. at 316-17, 94 S.Ct. at 1110-11; United States v. Calle, 822 F. 2d 1016, 1020 (11th Cir.1987); United States v. Andrews, 765 F. 2d 1491, 1501 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064, 106 S.Ct. 815, 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); Jenkins v. Wainwright, 763 F. 2d 1390, 1392 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164, 106 S.Ct. 2290, 90 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986). “This court has long recognized the particular importance of searching cross-exam…
• United States v. Charris, 822 F.2d 1213 (1st Cir. 1987)
  …author has been cross-examined); United States v. Treadwell, 760 F. 2d 327, 340 (D.C.Cir.1985) (finding no prejudice in allowing jury to consider a document not admitted into evidence that summarized the testimony of a federal agent), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064, 106 S.Ct. 814, 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986). VI. THE DECISION TO EXCUSE A JUROR The final issue concerns the district court’s decision to excuse a juror and allow the remaining eleven jurors to return a verdict. Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 23(b)…