SHABAZZ
v.
OKLAHOMA
SHABAZZ
OKLAHOMA
474 U.S. 1068
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 23 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (23 total)
-
Gonzales v. Duenas-Alvarez, 549 U.S. 183 (U.S. 2007)…443 (CADC 1996); United States v. [*198] Miller, 22 F. 3d 1075,1078-1079 (CA11 1994); United States v. Moore, 936 F. 2d 1508, 1527 (CA7), cert. denied, 502 U. S. 991 (1991); United States v. Graewe, 774 F. 2d 106, 108, n. 1 (CA6 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1068 and 1069 (1986); United States v. Barnett, 667 F. 2d 835, 841 (CA9 1982); United States v. DeLaMotte, 434 F. 2d 289, 293 (CA2 1970), cert. denied, 401 U. S. 921 (1971).…
-
United States v. Belgard, 894 F.2d 1092 (9th Cir. 1990)…dicial branch of government. Not only can they, but they are virtually indispensable. We, too, have recognized the important function of probation officers. As we noted in United States v. Gonzales, 765 F. 2d 1393, 1398 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1068, 106 S.Ct. 826, 88 L.Ed.2d 798 (1986), “when the [probation] officer is preparing a pre-sentence report he is acting as an arm of the court.” While the details of the duties and role of a probation officer have changed under the Guidelines, the pro…
-
United States v. Mobile Materials, Inc., 881 F.2d 866 (10th Cir. 1989)…parent from the context. The court can require explanations to be concise, however. And under 28 U.S.C. § 753(b), all court proceedings in criminal cases must be recorded. United States v. Gallo, 763 F. 2d 1504, 1529-32 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1068, 106 S.Ct. 826, 88 L.Ed.2d 798 (1986). We have reviewed the entire record in this case and think that the district court was familiar with the basis of the objections of appellants. Both parties were represented by able counsel. The summary denial…
Previewing 3 of 23 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence