WRIGHT ET AL.
v.
CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
WRIGHT ET AL.
CITY OF ROANOKE REDEVELOPMENT AND HOUSING AUTHORITY
474 U.S. 1081
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 88 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (66 total)
-
United States v. Hawkins, 905 F.2d 1489 (11th Cir. 1990)…ms that the Postal Service had no basis for investigating FRC, but rather harassed FRC out of business and caused most of the complaints itself by shutting off FRC's mail. See United States v. Love, 767 F. 2d 1052, 1063 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1081, 106 S.Ct. 848, 849, 88 L.Ed.2d 890 (1986) (hearsay statement admissible, although not for truth of assertions therein, to explain "why a government investigation was undertaken"). We note that to the extent Collins's testimony threatened to get in…
-
United States v. Tarantino, 846 F.2d 1384 (D.C. Cir. 1988)…52(b)(1), and the courts have construed “business enterprise” to require “a continuing course of conduct rather than sporadic casual involvement in a proscribed activity.” United States v. Kendall, 766 F. 2d 1426, 1434 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1081, 106 S.Ct. 848, 88 L.Ed.2d 889 (1986); United States v. Corbin, 662 F. 2d 1066, 1072 (4th Cir.1981). See also H.R.Rep. No. 966, 87th Cong., 1st Sess. 3 (1961) (“[Individual or isolated violations would not come within the scope of this bill since…1 / 2
-
United States v. Marmon Dennis Record, 873 F.2d 1363 (10th Cir. 1989)…in the case, and that the government “must articulate precisely the evidential hypothesis by which a fact of consequence may be inferred from the evidence of other acts.” United States v. Kendall, 766 F. 2d 1426, 1436 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1081, 106 S.Ct. 848, 88 L.Ed.2d 889 (1986). We have also required the trial court to “specifically identify the purpose for which such evidence is offered,” further noting that “a broad statement merely invoking or restating Rule 404(b) will not suffice.…
Previewing 3 of 66 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence