HARRELL
v.
UNITED STATES; GIBSON V. UNITED STATES; GRAVES V. UNITED STATES; MARCACCIO V. UNITED STATES; WHITE V. UNITED STATES; KEATING V. UNITED STATES; SEAVER V. UNITED STATES; LACKEY V. UNITED STATES; HART V. UNITED STATES; AND RUBY V. UNITED STATES
HARRELL
UNITED STATES; GIBSON V. UNITED STATES; GRAVES V. UNITED STATES; MARCACCIO V. UNITED STATES; WHITE V. UNITED STATES; KEATING V. UNITED STATES; SEAVER V. UNITED STATES; LACKEY V. UNITED STATES; HART V. UNITED STATES; AND RUBY V. UNITED STATES
474 U.S. 1100
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Caution
Cited by 43 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (43 total)
-
Harris v. State, 580 So. 2d 804 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991)…sideration of one of several offenses initially charged, does not constitute a forbidden amendment”). See also United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F. 2d 1459, reh. denied, 766 F. 2d 1493 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, sub nom. Harrell v. United States, 474 U.S. 1100, 106 S.Ct. 879, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986); United States v. Diaz, 690 F. 2d 1352 (11th Cir.1982). Finally, Harris contends that the lower court (1) erred in imposing costs pursuant to section 27.3455, Florida Statutes (1986), section 960.20, Florida St…
-
Zinermon v. Burch, 494 U.S. 113 (U.S. 1990)…839, 843 (CA6 1988); Wilson v. Clayton, 839 F. 2d 375, 382 (CA7 1988); Fetner v. Roanoke, 813 F. 2d 1183, 1185-1186 (CA11 1987); Freeman v. Blair, 793 F. 2d 166, 177 (CA8 1986); Patterson v. Coughlin, 761 F. 2d 886, 891-893 (CA2 1985), cert. denied, 474 U. S. 1100 (1986); Bretz v. Kelman, 773 F. 2d 1026, 1031 (CA9 1985) (en banc); Wolfenbarger v. Williams, 774 F. 2d 358, 363-365 (CA10 1985). Other Courts of Appeals have held that Parratt applies even to deprivations effected by the very state officials charg…
-
COX v. Adm'r United States Steel & Carnegie & United States Steel & Carnegie Pension Fund, 17 F.3d 1386 (11th Cir. 1994)…(11th Cir.1986), as long as “each act constitutes a separate violation of the state or federal statute governing the conduct in question,” United States v. Watchmaker, 761 F. 2d 1459, 1475 (11th Cir.1985) (internal quotations omitted), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1100, 106 S.Ct. 879, 88 L.Ed.2d 917 (1986). “‘If distinct statutory violations are found, the predicate acts will be considered to be distinct irrespective of the circumstances under which they arose.’ ” United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F. 2d 1530, 1545 (1…
Previewing 3 of 43 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence