HURWITZ

v.

TEXAS

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• United States v. Sherlock, 962 F.2d 1349 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …and Charley must prove they suffered actual, non-speculative prejudice from the delay. United States v. Lovasco, 431 U.S. 783, 789, 97 S.Ct. 2044, 2048, 52 L.Ed.2d 752 (1977); United States v. Moran, 759 F. 2d 777, 782 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102, 106 S.Ct. 885, 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986). Second, they must show that the delay, when balanced against the prosecution’s reasons for it, offends those “fundamental conceptions of justice [*1354] which lie at the base of our' civil and political institu…
• United States v. Maria del Socorro Pardo Viuda De Aguilar, 883 F.2d 662 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …se was established.” Id. at 552. Where defendant’s actions move far beyond advocacy to participation in the unlawful activity, the first amendment is no bar to prosecution. See United States v. Moran, 759 F. 2d 777, 785 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102, 106 S.Ct. 885, 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986) (challenging sufficiency of the evidence on first amendment grounds); United States v. Little, 753 F. 2d 1420, 1434 (9th Cir. 1984) (seeking acquittal on first amendment grounds). . In their attack on the consp…
• United States v. Gordon, 844 F.2d 1397 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …nspiracy.’ ” United States v. Moran, 759 F. 2d 777, 784 (9th Cir.1985)(quoting United States v. Jabara, 618 F. 2d 1319, 1327)(9th Cir.), cert. denied sub nom. Hood v. United States, 446 U.S. 987, 100 S.Ct. 2973, 64 L.Ed.2d 845 (1980)), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1102, 106 S.Ct. 885, 88 L.Ed.2d 920 (1986). The relevant factors in determining the existence of such an “overall agreement” are the nature of the scheme, the identity of the participants, the quality, frequency and duration of each conspirator’s transac…