CROCKER NATIONAL BANK

v.

PERDUE

Citator

Cited By (18 total)

• L.P.M. and J.D.T. v. Sch. Bd. OF Seminole Cnty., 753 So. 2d 130 (Fla. 5th DCA 2000)
  ….S.D. v. Stamos, 695 S.W. 2d 556, 561 (Tex.1985) (“The federal courts have made it @clear that the federal constitution’s due process guarantees do not protect a student’s interest in participating in extracurricular activities.”), appeal dismissed, 475 U.S. 1001, 106 S.Ct. 1170, 89 L.Ed.2d 290 (1986). Other state courts have reached the same conclusion. See Jordan v. O’Fallon Township High Sch. Dist. No. 203 Bd. of Educ., 802 Ill.App.3d 1070, 235 Ill.Dec. 877, 706 N.E. 2d 137, 140 (1999) (finding no right…
• Shapero v. Ky. Bar Ass'n, 486 U.S. 466 (U.S. 1988)
  …d the recipient to believe she has a legal problem that she does not actually have or, worse yet, could offer erroneous legal advice. See, e. g., Leoni v. State Bar of California, 39 Cal. 3d 609, 619-620, 704 P. 2d 183, 189 (1985), summarily dism’d, 475 U. S. 1001 (1986). But merely because targeted, direct-mail solicitation presents lawyers with opportunities for isolated abuses or mistakes does not justify a total ban on that mode of protected commercial speech. See In re R. M. J., 455 U. S., at 203. The…
• Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. Reilly, 533 U.S. 525 (U.S. 2001)
  …5) (Holmes, J., dissenting), and if speech may be suppressed whenever it might inspire someone to act unlawfully, then there is no limit to the State’s censorial power. Cf. American Booksellers Assn., Inc. v. Hudnut, 771 F. 2d 323 (CA7 1985), aff’d, 475 U. S. 1001 (1986). There is a deeper flaw in the State’s argument. Even if Massachusetts has a valid interest in regulating speech directed at children — who, it argues, may be more easily misled, and to whom the sale of tobacco products is unlawful— it may n…