LONG

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Student Pub. Interest Research Grp. OF NEW Jersey, Inc. v. AT & T Bell Labs., 842 F.2d 1436 (3d Cir. 1988)
  …orneys’ actual billing rates, whenever such rates exist, even where attorneys set their rates artificially low to serve the public interest. In Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community v. City of Prior Lake, 771 F. 2d 1153 (8th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011, 106 S.Ct. 1185, 89 L.Ed.2d 301 (1986), [*1444] the court depended exclusively on counsel’s billing rate. The court distinguished Blum from the case before it on the ground that the attorneys in the case before it possessed a billing schedule for si…
• United States v. Staggs, 881 F.2d 1527 (10th Cir. 1989)
  …th Circuit and one from the Eighth Circuit, to support its conclusion that the allegations in Count I can be considered to determine the sufficiency of Counts II and III: United States v. Esposito, 771 F. 2d 283, 288-89 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1011, 106 S.Ct. 1187, 89 L.Ed.2d 302 (1986); United States v. Moya-Gomez, 860 F. 2d 706, 752 (7th Cir.1988); and United States v. Becton, 751 F. 2d 250, 256-57 (8th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 472 U.S. 1018, 105 S.Ct. 3480, 87 L.Ed.2d 615 (1985). See also U…

  ← 1 / 2 →