MARKOWSKI

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (40 total)

• United States v. Rigoberto Moya-Gomez, 860 F.2d 706 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …ich the defendant receives substantial income or resources. 21 U.S.C. § 848(d); Garrett v. United States, 471 U.S. 773, 781, 105 S.Ct. 2407, 2413, 85 L.Ed.2d 764 (1985); United States v. Markowski, 772 F. 2d 358, 360-61 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018, 106 S.Ct. 1202, 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986). Celestino challenges the government’s proof on the question of whether he held a supervisory, managerial, or organizational position with respect to at least five other individuals.33 [*746] The CCE statute is…

  ← 1 / 4 →
• Salim Aoude v. Mobil OIL Corp., 892 F.2d 1115 (1st Cir. 1989)
  …ote omitted). The Civil Rules neither completely describe, nor purport to delimit, the district courts’ powers. See HMG Property, 847 F. 2d at 915; Brockton Savings Bank v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 771 F. 2d 5, 11 (1st Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018, 106 S.Ct. 1204, 89 L.Ed.2d 317 (1986). Rather, the district courts retain the inherent power to do what is necessary and proper to conduct judicial business in a satisfactory manner. As we have said, that inherent power is “rooted in the chancellor…
• United States v. Beverly, 913 F.2d 337 (7th Cir. 1990)
  …ically the persons it found Mr. Beverly had organized, supervised, or managed. However, it is well settled that the law "does not make the identity of the five important.” United States v. Markowski, 772 F. 2d 358, 364 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1018, 106 [*353] S.Ct. 1202, 89 L.Ed.2d 316 (1986). Therefore, a CCE conviction will stand where those who were organized, supervised, or managed are unidentified. See id. (“The CCE statute is directed against all enterprises of a certain size; the iden…

  ← 1 / 2 →