BEAMON

v.

WAINWRIGHT, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS

Citator

Cited By (21 total)

• United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …2d 191 (1986) (“testimony that could not reasonably be expected to make a difference to the outcome of the trial is not necessary” to an adequate defense under Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(b)); Sharlow v. Israel, 767 F. 2d 373, 377 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1212, 89 L.Ed.2d 324 (1986) (excluded evidence must be “critical” to the defendant’s defense). [*1519] The defendant claims that Ana would have been able to produce evidence substantiating his defense had she been available to testify, ar…
• Haitian Refugee Ctr., Inc. v. Nelson, 872 F.2d 1555 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …Services secretary’s implementation of the Age Discrimination Act). . The members of the plaintiff class are at varying stages of the application process. . Appellants’ reliance on Garcia-Mir v. Smith, 766 F. 2d 1478 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1213, 89 L.Ed.2d 325 (1986), is misplaced. In that case, which also involved a class-wide challenge to INS procedures, we held that the statutory exhaustion requirement barred plaintiffs’ additional claims for substantive review of their…
• United States v. LeQUIRE, 943 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …prove that the delay was a product of deliberate design by the government to gain a tactical advantage. See, e.g., Stoner v. Graddick, 751 F. 2d 1535, 1542 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Warren, 772 F. 2d 827, 836 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1214, 89 L.Ed.2d 326 (1986); United States v. Jorge-Salon, 734 F. 2d 789, 791-92 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 869, 105 S.Ct. 215, 83 L.Ed.2d 145 (1984). The appellants have not shown substantial prejudice or intentional delay for…