ADAMS

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Nesbitt, 852 F.2d 1502 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …2d 191 (1986) (“testimony that could not reasonably be expected to make a difference to the outcome of the trial is not necessary” to an adequate defense under Fed.R.Crim.P. 17(b)); Sharlow v. Israel, 767 F. 2d 373, 377 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1212, 89 L.Ed.2d 324 (1986) (excluded evidence must be “critical” to the defendant’s defense). [*1519] The defendant claims that Ana would have been able to produce evidence substantiating his defense had she been available to testify, ar…
• United States v. LeQUIRE, 943 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …prove that the delay was a product of deliberate design by the government to gain a tactical advantage. See, e.g., Stoner v. Graddick, 751 F. 2d 1535, 1542 (11th Cir.1985); United States v. Warren, 772 F. 2d 827, 836 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1214, 89 L.Ed.2d 326 (1986); United States v. Jorge-Salon, 734 F. 2d 789, 791-92 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 869, 105 S.Ct. 215, 83 L.Ed.2d 145 (1984). The appellants have not shown substantial prejudice or intentional delay for…
• United States v. Reed, 980 F.2d 1568 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …United States, 295 U.S. 78, 55 S.Ct. 629, 79 L.Ed. 1314 (1935), overruled on other grounds, Stirone v. United States, 361 U.S. 212, 80 S.Ct. 270, 4 L.Ed.2d 252 (1960); United States v. Warren, 772 F. 2d 827, 835 n. 12 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1022, 106 S.Ct. 1214, 89 L.Ed.2d 326 (1986). Such prejudice exists when (1) the proof at trial differs so greatly from the charges in the indictment that the defendant is unfairly surprised and has an inadequate opportunity to prepare a defense, or (2)…