STEINES

v.

ROCK ISLAND ARSENAL DEPARTMENT OF ARMY ET AL.; ALLEN V. GEORGIA; HURVITZ V. DIVISION OF MEDICAL QUALITY, BOARD OF MEDICAL QUALITY ASSURANCE, DEPARTMENT OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS OF CALIFORNIA; PENNINGTON, ADMINISTRATOR FOR THE ESTATE OF TORRES V. FLOTA MERCANTE GRANCOLOMBIANA, S.A., ET AL.; MCKINNEY V. ELLIS ET AL.; SCHEPPF V. KING, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.; VEALE ET AL. V. VEALE ET AL.; CALPIN V. UNITED STATES; HANCE V. GEORGIA; CONKLIN V. GEORGIA; FRAZIER V. PLACER SAVINGS & LOAN ASSN. ET AL.; GENTSCH V. ROBERSON ET AL.; PARKER V. FAIRMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.; HOOKS V. PHELPS, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS; MARTIN V. OHIO

Citator

Cited By

• Conklin v. Schofield, 366 F.3d 1191 (11th Cir. 2004)
  …Supreme Court denied Conklin’s petition for writ of certiorari on December 16, 1985. On February 24, 1986, the Court denied Conklin’s request for rehearing. See Conklin v. Georgia, 474 U.S. 1038, 106 S.Ct. 606, 88 L.Ed.2d 584 (1985), reh’g denied, 475 U.S. 1040, 106 S.Ct. 1252, 89 L.Ed.2d 359 (1986). Conklin then filed a state habeas corpus petition on April 7, 1986. Evidentiary hearings were conducted in the state court on May 24, 1989, and September 24, 1990. The state court denied habeas relief on Oc…
• Shereen Ramona Zipfel v. Halliburton Co., 832 F.2d 1477 (9th Cir. 1987)
  …of Review We review for abuse of discretion a district court’s dismissal of a case on the ground of forum non conveniens. Piper, 454 U.S. at 237, 102 S.Ct. at 256; Pereira v. Utah Transport, Inc., 764 F. 2d 686, 690 (9th Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 475 U.S. 1040, 106 S.Ct. 1253, 89 L.Ed.2d 362 (1986). The forum non conveniens determination is committed to the sound discretion of the trial court. It may be reversed only when there has been a clear abuse of discretion; where the court has considered all rele…
• Sparling v. Hoffman Constr. Co., Inc., 864 F.2d 635 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …that Washington law controls this case, and the Judge thus erred in awarding attorney’s fees under Alaska law. We review the District Court’s choice of law de novo. Pereira v. Utah Transport, Inc., 764 F. 2d 686, 689 (9th Cir.1985), cert. dismissed, 475 U.S. 1040, 106 S.Ct. 1253, 89 L.Ed.2d 362 (1986). Because the complaint was originally filed in Washington, Washington’s choice of law rules apply. See Van Dusen v. Barrack, 376 U.S. 612, 639, 84 S.Ct. 805, 820, 11 L.Ed.2d 945 (1964); General Accident Ins. C…