ROSENTHAL ET AL.

v.

DAY ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (30 total)

• Miranda v. B & B Cash Grocery Store, Inc., 975 F.2d 1518 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …claim is for unequal pay for equal work based upon sex, the standards of the Equal Pay Act apply whether the suit alleges violation of Equal Pay Act or Title VII); Foster v. Arcata Associates, Inc., 772 F. 2d 1453, 1465 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048, 106 S.Ct. 1267, 89 L.Ed.2d 576 (1986) (when Title VII claimant contends that she has been denied equal pay for substantially equal work Equal Pay Act standards apply). Because the district court dismissed on summary judgment Miranda’s EPA claim,…
• United States v. Gonzalez, 921 F.2d 1530 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …dicate offenses, and; two, whether successive prosecutions of this type are violative of constitutional double jeopardy. This question has already been addressed in this Circuit. United States v. Boldin, 772 F. 2d 719 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048, 106 S.Ct. 1269, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986) applied the first part of the Garrett test to RICO and its predicate offenses. Boldin used a three-prong analysis from Albernaz v. United States, 450 U.S. 333, 336-42, 101 S.Ct. 1137, 1149-44, 67 L.Ed.2d 275 (1…
• United States v. LeQUIRE, 943 F.2d 1554 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …O demonstrates that Congress did not intend predicate offenses to be lesser included offenses in the RICO provisions. United States v. Hawkins, 658 F. 2d 279 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Boldin, 772 F. 2d 719, 729 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1048, 106 S.Ct. 1269, 89 L.Ed.2d 577 (1986). Instead, the two offenses “are intended to deter two different kinds of activity: racketeering on the one hand and narcotics violations on the other.” Boldin, 772 F. 2d at 729, quoting United States v. Thoma…