LANE, DIRECTOR, ILLINOIS DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

v.

REED

Citator

Cited By

• Taylor v. Gilmore, 954 F.2d 441 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …discussion, that the other cases cited for support in Falconer — including Clark v. Jago, 676 F. 2d 1099 (6th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 466 U.S. 977, 104 S.Ct. 2360, 80 L.Ed.2d 832 (1984), and Reed v. Lane, 759 F. 2d 618 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1054, 106 5.Ct. 1282, 89 L.Ed.2d 589 (1986) — are either too general or too tangential to have dictated its result. But this does not end our inquiry. In determining whether a given decision is compelled by precedent, we examine not only the precedent t…
• Johnson v. Chrans, 844 F.2d 482 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …Hartigan, 768 F. 2d 161, 162-63 (7th Cir.1985) (state’s interest in preventing surprise and confusion through rule barring witnesses not identified in advance of trial cannot sustain exclusion of highly material exculpatory testimony), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1054, 106 S.Ct. 1281, 89 L.Ed.2d 588 (1986); McMorris, 643 F. 2d at 462-63 (state cannot refuse to admit exculpatory polygraph results based solely on prosecutor’s discretionary decision to oppose admission). On the other side of the balance, we also ex…
• Whipple v. Duckworth, 957 F.2d 418 (7th Cir. 1992)
  …fth Amendment violation occurs when the instructions provided do not “accurately [reflect] the law as it appeared at the time of the alleged criminal conduct.” United States ex rel. Reed v. Lane, 759 F. 2d 618, 623 (7th Cir.1985), certiorari denied, 475 U.S. 1054, 106 S.Ct. 1282, 89 L.Ed.2d 589. Consequently, a defendant is entitled to have a jury consider any defense theory that is supported by law and has some foundation in the evidence. United States v. Briscoe, 896 F. 2d 1476 (7th Cir.1990), certiorari…