RANDALL ET AL.

v.

LOFTSGAARDEN ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Illinois v. Krull, 480 U.S. 340 (U.S. 1987)
  …rches, the Illinois Supreme Court concluded that good-faith reliance upon that statute could not be used to justify the admission of evidence under an exception to the exclusionary rule. Id., at 118-119, 481 N. E. 2d, at 708. We granted certiorari, 475 U. S. 1080 (1986), to consider whether a good-faith exception to the Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule applies when an officer’s reliance on the constitutionality of a statute is objectively reasonable, but the statute is subsequently declared unconstitutiona…
• Keystone Bituminous Coal Assn. v. Debenedictis, 480 U.S. 470 (U.S. 1987)
  …Subsidence Act was justified by the legislative finding “that subsidence damage devastated many surface structures and thus endangered the health, safety, and economic welfare of the Commonwealth and its people.” Id., at 718. We granted certiorari, 475 U. S. 1080 (1986), and now affirm. Ill Petitioners assert that disposition of their takings claim10 calls for no more than a straightforward application of the Court’s decision in Pennsylvania Coal Co. v. Mahon. Although there are some obvious similarities b…
• Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Woods, 480 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1987)
  …dgment has been paid, except for the $30,500 statutory affirmance penalty, which petitioner has withheld pending proceedings in this Court. We granted certiorari to consider the equal protection and due process challenges as well as the Erie claim. 475 U. S. 1080 (1986). Because we conclude that the Alabama statute imposing a mandatory affirmance penalty has no application in federal diversity actions, we decline to reach the Fourteenth Amendment issues. l — l I — l The Alabama statute provides in relevant…