MARYLAND

v.

ELFADL

Citator

Cited By (26 total)

• State v. Nishi, 521 So. 2d 252 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988)
  …charged. A number of federal cases have construed the EICO Act in just this way. The reasoning of the Seventh Circuit in McCullough v. Suter, 757 F. 2d 142 (7th Cir.1985) and in United States v. DiCaro, 772 F. 2d 1314 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1081, 106 S.Ct. 1458, 89 L.Ed.2d 716 (1986) is instructive. In McCullough, the court held that a sole proprietorship can be an “enterprise” with which its proprietor can be “associated.” The defendant in McCullough ran the National Investment Publishing…
• Colorado v. Bertine, 479 U.S. 367 (U.S. 1987)
  …trunks and suitcases to violate the Fourth Amendment, meant that Opperman and Lafayette did not govern this case.2 We granted certiorari to consider the important and recurring question of federal law decided by the Colorado Supreme [*371] Court.3 475 U. S. 1081 (1986). As that court recognized, inventory searches are now a well-defined exception to the warrant requirement of the Fourth Amendment. See Lafayette, supra, at 643; Opperman, supra, at 367-376. The policies behind the warrant requirement are not…
• Int'l Paper Co. v. Ouellette, 479 U.S. 481 (U.S. 1987)
  …III), and the Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed for the reasons stated by the District Court. 776 F. 2d 55, 56 (1985) (per curiam). We granted certiorari to resolve the circuit conflict on this important issue of federal pre-emption. 475 U. S. 1081 (1986). We now affirm the denial of IPC’s motion to dismiss, but reverse the decision below to the extent it permits the application of Vermont law to this litigation. We hold that when a court considers a state-law claim concerning interstate water…