ARMSTRONG

v.

FAIRMAN, WARDEN, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Oahu GAS Serv., Inc. v. Pac. Res. Inc., 838 F.2d 360 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highland Skiing Corp., 472 U.S. 585, 105 S.Ct. 2847, 86 L.Ed.2d 467 (1985); Dimidowich v. Bell & Howell, 803 F. 2d 1473, 1478 (9th Cir.1986); Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., 780 F. 2d 735, 740 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1087, 106 S.Ct. 1471, 89 L.Ed.2d 727 (1986). The investment required of Pacific Resources to produce propane would have resulted in a negative return. In light of the then-existing price controls, it was not economically efficient for Pacific Resources…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Image Tech. Serv., Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co., 903 F.2d 612 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …e also Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., 780 F. 2d 735, 740 (9th Cir.) (“desire to control quality” held a legitimate business justification for a tying arrangement sufficient to support summary judgment on a section 2 claim), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1087, 106 S.Ct. 1471, 89 L.Ed.2d 727 (1986). Image Tech argues, and the majority agrees, that summary judgment is not appropriate because Kodak’s policies may in part be motivated by a desire to exclude the ISOs. However, the mere presence of monopolist…
• Gerald R. & Helen Ferguson v. Greater Pocatello Chamber OF Commerce, Inc., 848 F.2d 976 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …der section 2 of the Sherman Act. The district court applied the appropriate tests for the Fergusons’ monopolization and attempt to monopolize claims. See Drinkwine v. Federated Publications, Inc., 780 F. 2d 735, 738-41 (9th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1087, 106 S.Ct. 1471, 89 L.Ed.2d 727 (1986). The Fergusons do not seriously question the district court’s holdings on appeal We therefore affirm the district court’s grant of summary judgment on the Fergusons’ section 2 claims. VII. All of the issues i…