LAUVE

v.

SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN; LAUVE V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF MICHIGAN; AND LAUVE V. SECRETARY OF STATE OF MICHIGAN

Citator

Cited By

• Adams v. State, 543 So. 2d 1244 (Fla. 1989)
  …signed in 1986. The governor granted a stay of one warrant in order that Adams be evaluated for his competency to be executed. After Adams was found competent, another warrant was signed. See Adams v. Wainwright, 484 So. 2d 580 (Fla.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1104, 106 S.Ct. 1506, 89 L.Ed.2d 907 (1986). . Adams submitted the affidavits of two of his counsel to support these allegations. Lead trial counsel for Adams at sentencing later filed an affidavit disclaiming the allegation that he was constrained in p…
• United States v. Hernandez, 921 F.2d 1569 (11th Cir. 1991)
  …anting of a motion for severance unless its standards are met, even in the absence of prejudice; review on appeal is for an error of law. United States v. Lane, 474 U.S. 438, 449 n. 12, 106 S.Ct. 725, 732 n. 12, 88 L.Ed.2d 814 (1986), reh’g denied, 475 U.S. 1104, 106 S.Ct. 1507, 89 L.Ed.2d 907 (1986); Corbin, 734 F. 2d at 649. However, the Lane holding itself decided that Rule 8 motions are subject to harmless error review on appeal. Lane, 474 U.S. at 449,106 S.Ct. at 732. This raised the possibility that…