WASHINGTON STATE NURSES ASSN.
v.
WASHINGTON STATE HOSPITAL COMMISSION ET AL.
WASHINGTON STATE NURSES ASSN.
WASHINGTON STATE HOSPITAL COMMISSION ET AL.
475 U.S. 1120
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Caution
Cited by 32 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (32 total)
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. The State of Fla. Dep't OF Env't Prot. & Sekoff Invs., Inc., 714 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 3d DCA 1998)…McLaughlin v. Richland Shoe Co., 486 U.S. 128, 108 S.Ct. 1677, 100 L.Ed.2d 115 (1988); Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Thurston, 469 U.S. 111, 105 S.Ct. 613, 83 L.Ed.2d 523 (1985); United State v. Baldwin, 770 F. 2d 1550 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1120, 106 S.Ct. 1636, 90 L.Ed.2d 182 (1986), and state statutes, see Lewek v. State, 702 So. 2d 527 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997). We therefore hold that FDEP did not err in applying this definition to the term “willful violation.” Also, FDEP correctly concluded…
-
In re Contempt Adjudication of the Broward Cnty. State Attorney's Off., 577 So. 2d 967 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…sistant state attorneys who appeared in court and made, or sat there mute as one or more of their number made, the misrepresentations to the judge. The trial judge’s brief cites United States v. Baldwin, 770 F. 2d 1550 (11th Cir.1985), cert, denied, 475 U.S. 1120, 106 S.Ct. 1636, 90 L.Ed.2d 182 (1986), in support of her position that the contempt was direct. However, we distinguish that case. In Baldwin, the trial judge, twice, directly ordered the particular lawyer to appear in court at a certain place and…
-
Forsyth Cnty. v. Nationalist Movement, 505 U.S. 123 (U.S. 1992)…t reversed this aspect of the District Court's judgment. Nationalist Movement v. City of Cumming, 913 F. 2d 885 (1990). Relying on its prior opinion in Central Florida Nuclear Freeze Campaign v. Walsh, 774 F. 2d 1515, 1521 (CA11 1985), cert. denied, 475 U. S. 1120 (1986), the Court of Appeals held: “An ordinance which charges more than a nominal fee for using public forums for public issue speech, violates the First Amendment.” 913 F. 2d, at 891 (internal quotation marks omitted). The court determined that a…
Previewing 3 of 32 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence