JOHN DAVID RANKIN

v.

STATE

Citator

Cited By

• Landingham v. Landingham, 685 So. 2d 946 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …Utreva, 386 So. 2d 1 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980) (reversing a trial court’s modification of custody based on the father’s failure to return the children to the mother as required by a court order); Doran v. Doran, 212 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 218 So. 2d 174 (Fla.1968). Although appellant violated the injunction when she moved to Colorado with the child, vindication of the trial court’s authority is subordinate to the child’s welfare. Crippen v. Crippen, 508 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). “Changing a…
• Fla. Ins. Guar. Ass'n v. Gustinger, 390 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)
  …t was authorized to assess fees in the rule nisi proceeding pursuant to Section 440.34(1), Fla.Stat. (1977). Steele v. A.D.H. Building Contractors, Inc., 196 So. 2d 430 (Fla.1967); McCormick v. Messink 208 So. 2d 113 (Fla.2d DCA 1968), cert. denied, 218 So. 2d 174 (Fla.1968). FIGA’s liability under that statute is unaffected by Sec. 631.70. Sec. 631.57(l)(b), Fla.Stat. (1979), clearly states that “[i]n no event shall the association be liable for any penalties or interest.” Applying this unambiguous statutor…
• Tessler v. Tessler, 539 So. 2d 522 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)
  …iately remedied by use of contempt rather than modification. See Breeding v. Breeding, 515 So. 2d 374 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Crippen v. Crippen, 508 So. 2d 1339 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). See also Doran v. Doran, 212 So. 2d 100 (Fla. 4th DCA), cert. denied, 218 So. 2d 174 (Fla.1968). However, here there is sufficient testimony in the record, albeit disputed, to support the findings and conclusion of the trial court that there had been a substantial change in circumstances, and that the best interest of the child was…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• State of Fla. ex rel. Dade Cnty. Optometric Ass'n, Inc. v. Fam. Optical Serv., 209 So. 2d 267 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968)