WHITE

v.

MOORE, CHAIRMAN AND COMPACT ADMINISTRATOR, MISSOURI BOARD OF PROBATION AND PAROLE, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bernal, 861 F.2d 434 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …e constitutionally made and that a full record will be available in the event that a challenge is made to the plea.” United States v. Adams, 684 F. 2d 830, 837 (5th Cir.1981); United States v. Guichard, 779 F. 2d 1139, 1141 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1127, 106 S.Ct. 1654, 90 L.Ed.2d 197 (1986). Rule 11 details both procedural and substantive requirements that must be met before a district court may accept a guilty plea. Guichard, 779 F. 2d at 1141. In United States v. Dayton, 604 F. 2d 931 (5th Cir.…
• United States v. Laurence Keiswetter, 860 F.2d 992 (10th Cir. 1988)
  …ke the sworn statement in this case was, when coupled with other evidence, found to be sufficient to support a district judge’s finding of a factual basis for a guilty plea in United States v. Guichard, 779 F. 2d 1139, 1146 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1127, 106 S.Ct. 1654, 90 L.Ed.2d 197 (1986).…
• United States v. Adams, 961 F.2d 505 (5th Cir. 1992)
  …fense to which he is pleading guilty), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 818, 106 S.Ct. 64, 65, 88 L.Ed.2d 52 (1985); see also Bachynsky, 949 F. 2d at 730 (relying on Antone); United States v. Guichard, 779 F. 2d 1139, 1146 (5th Cir.1986) (same), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1127, 106 S.Ct. 1654, 90 L.Ed.2d 197 (1986). We observe that courts, looking to the on-the-record colloquy used to satisfy both Rule 11(c)(1) and Rule 11(f), have produced language in several cases which seemingly commingles the requirements of these two…