BENEDUM

v.

PERINI, SUPERINTENDENT, MARION CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION

Citator

Cited By (36 total)

• Rehavam Adiel and Rivka Rosenbaum v. Elec. Fin. Sys., Inc., 513 So. 2d 1347 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
  …h v. Plant Indus., Inc., 535 F. 2d 550 (9th Cir.1976); cf. Malchman v. Davis, 761 F. 2d 893 (2d Cir.1985) (whether plaintiffs representation in antitrust class action suit is adequate is within the sound discretion of the trial court), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143, 106 S.Ct. 1798, 90 L.Ed.2d 343 (1986). The trial court was well within its discretion in determining that Adiel’s attempts to cajole the board of directors of Electronic Financial Systems, Inc. into effectuating a merger with a corporation he cont…
• Amchem Prods., Inc. v. Windsor, 521 U.S. 591 (U.S. 1997)
  …ty & Surety Co., 493 U. S. 959 (1989); Malchman v. Davis, 761 F. 2d 893, 900 (CA2 1985) (certification appropriate, in part, because “the interests of the members of the broadened class in the settlement agreement were commonly held”), cert. denied, 475 U. S. 1143 (1986). A proposed amendment to Rule 23 would expressly authorize settlement class certification, in conjunction with a motion by the settling parties for Rule 23(b)(3) certification, “even though the requirements of subdivision (b)(3) might not be…
• United States v. O'Connell, 841 F.2d 1408 (8th Cir. 1988)
  …nlikely to succeed if tried or to be too dangerous * * 18 U.S.C. § 2518(3)(c) (1982). Together these two sections create what the courts have called the “necessity requirement.” United States v. Garcia, 785 F. 2d 214, 223 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1143, 106 S.Ct. 1797, 90 L.Ed.2d 342 (1986). Patterson argues that Agent Crosby’s affidavit in support of the application was insufficient to meet the section 2518(1) standard. He also claims that traditional investigative techniques had been effective…