HIBERNIA NATIONAL BANK IN NEW ORLEANS
v.
CHUNG, YONG IL, ET AL.

U.S. | 1986-04-28
No. 85-1281
475 U.S. 1147 Supreme Court of the United States (1986) Positive Treatment
Cited by 14 cases
Topics
Letter Of Undertaking Seaman'S Wages Maritime Lien

Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Letter Of Undertaking cases and more on FLexlaw

Dissent
Justice White,

Justice White,

dissenting.

In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit held that the penalty wage provision of 46 U. S. C. §596, which operates in favor of seamen whose wages are not timely paid, applies to wages earned aboard a docked vessel for which no voyage has been scheduled. Chung, Yong Il v. Overseas Navigation Co., 774 F. 2d 1043 (1985). This holding conflicts with the decisions in Compton v. Alton Steamship Co., 608 F. 2d 96 (CA4 1979), and Eaton v. S.S. Export Challenger, 376 F. 2d 725 (CA4 1967).

The Eleventh Circuit also held that penalty wages continued to accrue against petitioner despite its filing with the District Court of a $400,000 letter of undertaking, in lieu of a bond, by which petitioner guaranteed payment of all maritime liens against its vessel. In so holding, the Eleventh Circuit rejected the view expressed in Southern Cross Steamship Co. v. Firipis, 285 F. 2d 651, 659-660 (CA4 1960), and Swain v. Isthmian Lines, Inc., 360 F. 2d 81, 88, n. 26 (CA3 1966), that a shipowner may stop the accruing of penalty wages by placing in the hands of the court the allegedly unlawfully withheld wages.

Additionally, the Eleventh Circuit held that penalty wages continued to accrue against petitioner up to the actual payment of the disputed wages shortly prior to oral argument on appeal. This ruling is difficult if not impossible to square with Pacific Mail S.S. Co. v. Schmidt, 241 U. S. 245 (1916), which we recently characterized with approval as “holding that when an appeal is taken on reasonable grounds, the penalty should not apply to delays in payment beyond the date on which the district court’s decree is entered, since those delays are supported by sufficient cause.” Griffin v. Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 U. S. 564, 574, n. 9 (1982).

I would grant certiorari to resolve the questions presented concerning the correct interpretation of the penalty wage statute.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

  • Howard Johnson Co., Inc. v. Khimani, 892 F.2d 1512 (11th Cir. 1990)
    …hey can come with safety to that which they are enjoined from doing. Eskay Drugs v. Smith, Kline & French Laboratories, 188 F. 2d 430, 432 (5th Cir.1951); see Scandia Down Corp. v. Euorquilt, Inc., 772 F. 2d 1423, 1432 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1147, 106 S.Ct. 1801, 90 L.Ed.2d 346 (1986) (district courts in trademark cases “possess[] substantial discretion to decide how close is too close, once an infringer has committed a contempt of the original injunction”); World’s Finest Chocolate, Inc. v.…
  • U.S. Indus., Inc. v. Touche Ross & Co., 854 F.2d 1223 (10th Cir. 1988)
    …I. Somewhat inconsistently, USI also asserted that FEA purchased worthless health spa contracts from HI, in order to inflate FEA’s book value. . See also Chung, Yong Il v. Overseas Navigation Co., 774 F. 2d 1043, 1057 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1147, 106 S.Ct. 1802, 90 L.Ed.2d 346 (1986) (“Prejudgment interest ... is in the nature of compensation for the use of funds.”); Myron v. Chicoine, 678 F. 2d 727, 734 (7th Cir.1982) (quoting Sanders v. John Nuveen & Co., 524 F. 2d 1064, 1075 (7th Cir.197…
  • Am. Home Prods. Corp. v. Barr Labs., Inc., 834 F.2d 368 (3d Cir. 1987)
    …e of likelihood of confusion, the validity of this approach has been largely undermined by the 1985 amendment to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 52(a).2 See Scandia Down Corp. v. Euroquilt, Inc., 772 F. 2d 1423, 1427-29 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1147, 106 S.Ct. 1801, 90 L.Ed.2d 346 (1986). This amendment made clear that a district court’s conclusions cannot be regarded as pertaining to a “question of law” — and thus reviewed de novo— merely because they are based on evidence that is theoretica…

Previewing 3 of 14 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw