SCOTT ET AL.

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Thompson, 944 F.2d 1331 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …luded from using the grand jury for the ‘sole or dominant purpose’ of obtaining additional evidence against him.” United States v. Moss, 756 F. 2d 329, 332 (4th Cir.1985); see also United States v. Scott, 784 F. 2d 787, 792 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1145, 106 S.Ct. 2257, 90 L.Ed.2d 702 (1986). Dawes maintains that the government effectively used the grand jury, rather than the procedures required by the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure, to conduct discovery into the charges already pending agains…
• Landano v. Rafferty, 897 F.2d 661 (3d Cir. 1990)
  …ble rights protected by the Brady doctrine. It would remove from the State “any incentive to make timely disclosure of material, exculpatory evidence and trivializes the constitutional right recognized in Brady and its progeny.” Monroe v. Blackburn, 476 U.S. 1145, 1150, 106 S.Ct. 2261, 2265, 90 L.Ed.2d 706 (1986) (Marshall, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). It is not an undue burden to force a state prisoner to go to state court upon finding the first piece or set of withheld evidence. It is an unf…
• United States v. Algienon Tanner, 941 F.2d 574 (7th Cir. 1991)
  …d 1216, 1221 (7th Cir.1984). “Absent legal error, exclusions of time cannot be reversed except when there is an abuse of discretion by the court and a showing of actual prejudice.” United States v. Scott, 784 F. 2d 787, 789 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1145, 106 S.Ct. 2257, 90 L.Ed.2d 702 (1986) (per curiam). Mr. Tanner asserts that the speedy trial clock began on October 10, 1989, the date on which the detainer was served and on which he requested a speedy trial. In the alternative, he argues that th…