FUENTES-JIMENEZ

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Brevard Cnty. v. Ramsey, 658 So. 2d 1190 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995)
  …2d 394 (1948); Greer v. United States, 448 F. 2d 937 (4th Cir.1971). The modified, Florida version of the Statute of Uses was discussed by the Florida Supreme Court in Chase Federal S & L v. Schreiber, 479 So. 2d 90, 96-97 (Fla.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160, 106 S.Ct. 2282, 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) where it was explained that: The Statute of Uses was enacted in 1535 to remedy the problems caused by dual legal and equitable ownership of land. Equitable ownership had arisen as a means of avoiding the legal…
• United States v. de Soto, 885 F.2d 354 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …ground for reversal by a court of appeals “only where the district court commits a clear abuse of discretion.” United States v. Marshall, 856 F. 2d 896, 901 (7th Cir.1988); see also United States v. Peco, 784 F. 2d 798, 800 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160, 106 S.Ct. 2281, 90 [*360] L.Ed.2d 723 (1986). However, the abuse of discretion standard of review does not mean the absence of any review at all. See In re Ronco, Inc., 838 F. 2d 212, 217 (7th Cir.1988) (“Review under an abuse of discretion standa…
• United States v. Sonnie Davis, 932 F.2d 752 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …knew he was tampering with a federal proceeding. United States v. Scaife, 749 F. 2d 338, 348 (6th Cir.1984); see also United States v. Ardito, 782 F. 2d 358, 360-61 (2d Cir.), cert. denied, 475 U.S. 1141, 106 S.Ct. 1792, 90 L.Ed.2d 338 cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1160, 106 S.Ct. 2281, 90 L.Ed.2d 723 (1986) (finding no scienter requirement that defendants know they were obstructing a federal proceeding). Cf. United States v. Brice, 926 F. 2d 925, 929 (9th Cir.1991). Consequently, appellant’s challenge to the suffi…