MILLER

v.

SOUTH CAROLINA

Citator

Cited By

• Marsden v. Louie Moore, 847 F.2d 1536 (11th Cir. 1988)
  …arately. a. Juror prejudice is presumed from pretrial publicity when such publicity is sufficiently prejudicial and inflammatory and saturated the community where the trial was held. Coleman v. Kemp, 778 F. 2d 1487, 1490 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164, 106 S.Ct. 2289, 90 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986). “The presumed prejudice principle is ‘rare[ly]’ applicable, and is reserved for an ‘extreme situation.’ ” Id. at 1490 (quoting Nebraska Press Ass’n v. Stuart, 427 U.S. 539, 554, 96 S.Ct. 2791, 2800, 49 L.Ed.2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• United States v. Lankford, 955 F.2d 1545 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …alle, 822 F. 2d 1016, 1020 (11th Cir.1987); United States v. Andrews, 765 F. 2d 1491, 1501 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 1064, 106 S.Ct. 815, 88 L.Ed.2d 789 (1986); Jenkins v. Wainwright, 763 F. 2d 1390, 1392 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164, 106 S.Ct. 2290, 90 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986). “This court has long recognized the particular importance of searching cross-examination of witnesses who have substantial incentive to cooperate with the proseeution.” Jenkins, 763 F. 2d at 1392 (citations o…
• United States v. Lehder-Rivas, 955 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …xtensive publicity, this Circuit has expressed a preference for an individual voir dire conducted by the trial court outside the presence of prospective jurors. See id. at 1508-10; Coleman v. Kemp, 778 F. 2d 1487, 1542 (11th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1164, 106 S.Ct. 2289, 90 L.Ed.2d 730 (1986). The trial court in the instant case collectively questioned the venire and then conducted an extensive and searching individual voir dire outside the presence of prospective jurors. The court questioned indiv…