IN RE DISBARMENT OF MARBLE

Citator

Cited By

• Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393 (U.S. 1987)
  …Ohio, 438 U. S. 586, 604 (1978) (plurality opinion). Certiorari was granted in the present case to consider petitioner’s contention that he was sentenced to death under a Florida statute that operated in a manner inconsistent with this requirement.1 476 U. S. 1168 (1986). H On July 31, 1976, 13-year-old Cynthia Driggers was strangled to death. At the time of the murder, both Cynthia and petitioner resided with Richard Hitchcock, who was Cynthia’s stepfather and petitioner’s brother. Petitioner initially con…
• Richardson v. Marsh, 481 U.S. 200 (U.S. 1987)
  …ument, admission of Williams’ confession “was powerfully incriminating to [respondent] with respect to the critical element of intent.” Id., at 1213. Thus, the Court of Appeals concluded, the Confrontation Clause was violated. We granted certiorari, 476 U. S. 1168 (1986), because the Sixth Circuit’s decision conflicts with those of other Courts of Appeals which have declined to adopt the “evidentiary linkage” or “contextual implication” approach to Bruton questions, see, e. g., United States v. Belle, 593 F.…
• Cruz v. New York, 481 U.S. 186 (U.S. 1987)
  …(1985), adopting the reasoning of the plurality opinion in Parker that Bruton did not require the codefendant’s confession to be excluded because Eulogio had himself confessed and his confession “interlocked” with Benjamin’s. We granted certiorari. 476 U. S. 1168 (1986). II The Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right of a criminal defendant “to be confronted with the witnesses against him.” We have held that that guarantee, extended against the States by the Fourteenth Amendment, i…