PROBE ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA STATE TEACHERS' RETIREMENT SYSTEM ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (31 total)

• Mertens v. Hewitt Assocs., 508 U.S. 248 (U.S. 1993)
  …. Employees Profit Sharing Trust v. Corrigan Enterprises, Inc., 793 F. 2d 1456, 1464- [*273] 1465 (CA5 1986), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 1034 (1987); Powell v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia, 780 F. 2d 419, 424 (CA4 1985), cert. denied, 476 U. S. 1170 (1986). . With respect to § 502(a)(2), however, under which a beneficiary may claim both “equitable” and “remedial” relief, see 29 U. S. C. § 1132(a)(2) (allowing “for appropriate relief under section 1109 of this title”), the courts are split ove…
• Clark v. Coats & Clark, Inc., 865 F.2d 1237 (11th Cir. 1989)
  …to amount to intentional infliction of emotional distress is preempted by ERISA. Howard v. Parisian, Inc., 807 F. 2d 1560 (11th Cir.1987). See also Powell v. Chesapeake & Potomac Telephone Co. of Virginia, 780 F. 2d 419 (4th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170, 106 S.Ct. 2892, 90 L.Ed.2d 980 (1986) (ERISA preempts state common law claim for intentional infliction of emotional distress, insofar as it is invoked by a beneficiary seeking relief for injuries arising out of pension plan administration). In ad…
• Unity Ventures v. Cnty. OF Lake, 841 F.2d 770 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …r any state legislative act(s) authorizes the challenged conduct and then determine whether anticompeti-tive effects are a foreseeable result of the authorization.” LaSalle Nat. Bank v. DuPage County, 777 F. 2d 377, 381 (7th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1170, 106 S.Ct. 2892, 90 L.Ed.2d 979 (1986). If the answers to both questions are yes, then we conclude that the state intended the local government’s action to be immune from antitrust challenge. In LaSalle National Bank, we analyzed the same statute…