LEVIN

v.

GUEST

Citator

Cited By

• Waltman v. Int'l Paper Co., 875 F.2d 468 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …, we also hold that IPCO’s dependence on deposition testimony that it did not submit to the district court during the pendency of the motion for summary judgment was improper. See Harsco Corp. v. Zlotnicki, 779 F. 2d 906 (3rd Cir.1985), cert. denied 476 U.S. 1171, 106 S.Ct. 2895, 90 L.Ed.2d 982 (1986); Mas Marques v. Digital Equipment Corp., 637 F. 2d 24 (1st Cir.1980). Waltman’s motion for reconsideration did include one deposition that was not completed until October 10, 1987, two days after Waltman filed…
• Craighead v. E.F. Hutton & Co., Inc., 899 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1990)
  …manipulative practice (with the requisite scienter) 3) in connection with 4) the purchase or sale 5) of a security 6) causing 7) damages. Wilsmann v. Upjohn Co., 775 F. 2d 713, 719 (6th Cir.1985) (quoting Mansbach, 598 F. 2d at 1026), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1171, 106 S.Ct. 2893, 90 L.Ed.2d 980 (1986). These claims are essentially fraud claims and must be pleaded with particularity. Moreover, “unsuitability” claims must plead “which transactions and securities are involved and the reason why these securities…
• United States v. Boden, 854 F.2d 983 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …y investigation, Oitker reasonably asked Boden what the cardboard boxes in his car contained. See United States v. Head, 783 F. 2d 1422, 1427 (9th Cir.) (drug agents permissibly asked Terry suspect whether he had drugs in his vehicle), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1171, 106 S.Ct. 2895, 90 L.Ed.2d 982 (1986). Thus, without more, the initial encounter did not exceed the bounds of a valid Terry stop at least up until the point at which Oitker entered Boden’s station wagon. D. Boden contends that he was placed under…