TARKOWSKI

v.

WOLFF ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (14 total)

• McKinley Dudley v. Duckworth, 854 F.2d 967 (7th Cir. 1988)
  …is a denial of fundamental fairness.” United States ex rel. Palmer v. DeRobertis, 738 F. 2d 168, 170 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 924, 105 S.Ct. 306, 83 L.Ed.2d 241 (1984); see also Love v. Young, 781 F. 2d 1307, 1312 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1185, 106 S.Ct. 2923, 91 L.Ed.2d 551 (1986); Cramer v. Fahner, 683 F. 2d 1376, 1385 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 459 U.S. 1016, 103 S.Ct. 376, 74 L.Ed.2d 509 (1982). In determining whether a writ should issue, the court must determine “whether the probative…
• United States v. Hoyos, 892 F.2d 1387 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …subject to de novo review. United States v. Smith, 790 F. 2d 789, 791 (9th Cir.1986). However, the underlying facts as found by the district court are reviewed for clear error. United States v. Greene, 783 F. 2d 1364, 1367 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1185, 106 S.Ct. 2923, 91 L.Ed.2d 551 (1986). The test for probable cause is whether the facts and circumstances within the arresting officer’s knowledge are sufficient to warrant a prudent person to believe a suspect has committed, is committing, or is…
• United States ex rel. Robert E. LEE v. Flannigan, 884 F.2d 945 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …ion is a mixed question of law and fact that is not governed by § 2254(d)’s presumption of correctness. See Sumner v. Mata, 455 U.S. 591, 597, 102 S.Ct. 1303, 1306, 71 L.Ed.2d 480 (1982); Love v. Young, 781 F. 2d 1307, 1311 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 476 U.S. 1185, 106 S.Ct. 2923, 91 L.Ed.2d 551 (1986). However, the underlying factual determinations, such as whether the witness had an opportunity to observe the suspect, are presumed correct. See Sumner, 455 U.S. at 597, 102 S.Ct. at 1307; United States ex re…