METROPOLITAN DADE COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANT,
v.
FLORIDA PROCESSING COMPANY, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Metropolitan Dade County appealed a circuit court order maintaining an injunction that prevented enforcement of a Cease and Desist Order against Florida Processing Company's fat-processing business and enjoined related criminal proceedings. The District Court affirmed the lower court's authority to enjoin criminal proceedings based on constitutional defects but remanded for determination of whether the underlying pollution control ordinance itself is constitutional.
The court held that equity powers may be applied to restrain criminal prosecutions under unconstitutional acts when essential to safeguard personal or property rights. However, the court remanded the case for the trial court to determine whether the pollution control ordinance itself is constitutional, as such a determination would be in the better interests of the parties.
“equity powers may be applied to restrain criminal prosecutions under unconstitutional acts when essential to safeguard personal or property rights”
Establishes the core legal principle that equity courts have authority to enjoin criminal proceedings based on constitutional defects
Previewing 1 of 2 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceFlorida Processing Company sought injunctive relief and filed a petition for certiorari challenging a Cease and Desist Order issued against its fat-pr…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Equity Powers cases and more on FLexlaw
The appellants have requested review of an order of the Circuit Court of Dade County, entered February 29, 1968, by which it was ordered that a prior injunction remain in full force and effect. The initial suit for injunctive relief was filed by the appellee, and was immediately followed by a petition for certiorari directed to the circuit court. The certiorari proceedings were held on the issue of whether due process was afforded the appellee in a certain administrative hearing which led to the issuance of a Cease and Desist Order being directed to the appellee’s fat-processing business. After certiorari proceedings, the court issued its injunction which enjoined the appellant, its boards, officers and agencies, and other persons acting by or for the appellant, from enforcing the Cease and Desist Order or otherwise interfering with or prosecuting the appellee in its operation and conduct of business.
When ruling on the subsequent motion to dissolve such injunction, the chancellor was aware that criminal proceedings were pending as to the same subject matter in another court. Nevertheless, he held that such criminal proceedings came within the purview of the existing injunction and ordered them enjoined. We agree with the appellee’s position that equity powers may be applied to restrain criminal prosecutions under unconstitutional acts when essential to safeguard personal or property *475rights. Watson v. Centro Espanol De Tampa, 158 Fla. 796, 30 So.2d 288.
However-, it is our holding that the entire cause be remanded to the chancellor so that he may rule upon the issue of whether the pollution control ordinance, Metropolitan Dade County Code § 24-5, ¶ 13, is itself constitutional, since such ruling will be in the better dispositive interests of the parties.
Remanded with directions.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Fla. Processing Co., 229 So. 2d 254 (Fla. 1969)…tent with this opinion. It is so ordered. ERVIN, C. J., DREW and ADKINS, JJ., and CULVER SMITH, Circuit Judge, concur. . It appears that the constitutionality of the Ordinance, a matter with which we are not now concerned, is being contested; see 218 So. 2d 474 (3rd D.C.A.Fla.1969).…
Authorities Cited
- Watson v. Centro Espanol de Tampa, 158 Fla. 796 (Fla. 1947)