CAMACHO ET AL.

v.

BUNYAN

Citator

Cited By (28 total)

• Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc., 481 U.S. 1 (U.S. 1987)
  …constitutional claims and that the balance of hardships favored Texaco. Accordingly, it affirmed the grant of in-junctive relief.8 Pennzoil filed a jurisdictional statement in this Court. We noted probable jurisdiction under 28 U. S. C. § 1254(2). 477 U. S. 903 (1986). We reverse. [*10] II The courts below should have abstained under the principles of federalism enunciated in Younger v. Harris, 401 U. S. 37 (1971). Both the District Court and the Court of Appeals failed to recognize the significant intere…
• United States v. Dunn, 480 U.S. 294 (U.S. 1987)
  …the protected curtilage.” 782 F. 2d, at 1227. The Government thereupon submitted a supplement to its petition for certiorari, revising the question presented [*300] to whether the barn lay within the curtilage of the house. We granted the petition, 477 U. S. 903, and now reverse. II The curtilage concept originated at common law to extend to the area immediately surrounding a dwelling house the same protection under the law of burglary as was afforded the house itself. The concept plays a part, however, i…
• Young v. United States ex rel. Vuitton et Fils S. A., 481 U.S. 787 (U.S. 1987)
  …he Second Circuit, petitioners urged that the District Court erred in appointing respondent’s attorneys, rather than a disinterested attorney, to prosecute the contempt. The Court of Appeals affirmed, 780 F. 2d 179 (1985), and we granted certiorari, 477 U. S. 903 (1986). We now reverse, exercising our supervisory power, and hold that counsel for a party that is the beneficiary of a court order may not be appointed to undertake contempt prosecutions for alleged violations of that order. H-( The injunction t…