CAMACHO

v.

RITZ-CARLTON WATER TOWER ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (58 total)

• Kaiser Aluminum & Chem. Corp. v. Bonjorno, 494 U.S. 827 (U.S. 1990)
  …emical Corp., 752 F. 2d 802, 815 (CA3 1984). Kaiser’s petition for rehearing in banc was denied, 1985-1 CCH Trade Cases ¶ 66,551 (CA3 1985), as was its subsequent petition for certiorari to this Court. Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. Bonjorno, 477 U. S. 908 (1986). The Court of Appeals did not refer in its opinion to the allowance of postjudgment interest; Bonjorno petitioned the Court of Appeals for instructions regarding interest to be included in the mandate pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Pr…
• United States v. Vito Spillone, 879 F.2d 514 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …es of authority, one suggesting de novo, the other abuse of discretion, review. Compare United States v. Benjamin, 852 F. 2d 413, 415 (9th Cir.1988) (de novo review) and United States v. De Rosa, 783 F. 2d 1401, 1404 (9th Cir.) (same), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3282, 91 L.Ed.2d 571 (1986) with United States v. Gonzalez, 800 F. 2d 895, 899 (9th Cir.1986) (abuse of discretion standard of review) and United States v. Noti, 731 F. 2d 610, 613 (9th Cir.1984) (same).2 We hold the de novo standard is…
• United States v. Hensley Garner, 837 F.2d 1404 (7th Cir. 1987)
  …rror would have been acquitted.” United States v. Silverstein, 732 F. 2d 1338, 1349 (7th Cir.1984), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 1111, 105 S.Ct. 792, 83 L.Ed.2d 785 (1985); see also United States v. Brantley, 786 F. 2d 1322, 1328 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 477 U.S. 908, 106 S.Ct. 3284, 91 L.Ed.2d 572 (1986). The defendant argues that he had not raised the issue of the Wagner & Sons notebook in his argument, and that the issue of intent, to which the prosecutor’s statement was directed, was not a defense raised by…