WILLIS
v.
CLEVELAND TRUST CO., AKA AMERITRUST CO., EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FIRESTONE, ET AL.
WILLIS
CLEVELAND TRUST CO., AKA AMERITRUST CO., EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF FIRESTONE, ET AL.
478 U.S. 1005
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 8 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re Data Access Sys. Sec. Litig. Appeal of Tolins & Lowenfels & Roger A. Tolins. Appeal of I. Kahlowsky & Co. & Peter Cunicelli, 843 F.2d 1537 (3d Cir. 1988)…73 L.Ed.2d 598 (1982); cf. Mineo v. Port Authority, 779 F. 2d 939 (3d Cir.1985) (holding that Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Auth., 469 U.S. 528, 105 S.Ct. 1005, 83 L.Ed.2d 1016 (1985) should not be applied retroactively), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1005, 106 S.Ct. 3297, 92 L.Ed.2d 712 (1986). I am therefore convinced that the re-troactivity issue must be addressed in determining whether the new rule of law should be applied to the district court’s order in this case. I commence my analysis from t…
-
Austin v. City OF Bisbee, 855 F.2d 1429 (9th Cir. 1988)…e of the harm to the party involved, but also because it discourages adherence to contemporary laws. Mineo v. Port Auth. of New York and New Jersey, 779 F. 2d 939, 943 (3d Cir.1985), reh’g denied, 783 F. 2d 42 (3d Cir.1986) (en banc), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1005, 106 S.Ct. 3297, 92 L.Ed.2d 712 (1986). We agree that retroactive application would be inappropriate in this case. Decisions that are to be applied only prospectively must satisfy the three-pronged test set forth in Chevron Oil Co. v. Huson, 404 U.…
-
Speer v. City OF Or., 847 F.2d 310 (6th Cir. 1988)…ll exists between the parties. We must decide whether the “case or controversy” jurisdictional requirement of Article III of the United States Constitution is met. See Rettig v. Kent City School District, 788 F. 2d 328, 330 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 478 U.S. 1005, 106 S.Ct. 3297, 92 L.Ed.2d 711 (1986). “Mootness results when events occur during the pendency of a litigation which render the court unable to grant the requested relief.” Carras v. Williams, 807 F. 2d 1286, 1289 (6th Cir.1986). In the instant c…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence