AIKEN, WARDEN
v.
HYMAN; AND HYMAN V. AIKEN, WARDEN
AIKEN, WARDEN
HYMAN; AND HYMAN V. AIKEN, WARDEN
478 U.S. 1016
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Caution
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Spivey v. Head, 207 F.3d 1263 (11th Cir. 2000)…9, 1459 (11th Cir.1985). When assessing this type of claim, this Court examines the entire context of the judicial proceeding to determine if it was fundamentally unfair. See Brooks v. Kemp, 762 F. 2d 1383, 1400 (11th Cir.1985) (en banc), vacated, 478 U.S. 1016, 106 S.Ct. 3325, 92 L.Ed.2d 732 (1986), reinstated, 809 F. 2d 700 (1987). Not every improper prosecutorial remark, therefore, renders the trial unfair. See id. Improper arguments do, however, render the capital sentencing hearing fundamentally unf…
-
People OF Territory OF Guam v. Muna, 999 F.2d 397 (9th Cir. 1993)…ntellectual level, he was aware of the nature of his actions. We conclude that the trial court’s conclusion is amply supported and not clearly erroneous. Muna relies on Corn v. Zant, 708 F. 2d 549 (11th Cir.1983), vacated, in part on other grounds, 478 U.S. 1016, 106 S.Ct. 3326, 92 L.Ed.2d 732 (1986), for the proposition that statements made during mental incompetency are involuntary, and contends that this is such a case. We find Corn v. Zant inappo-site and Muna’s argument unpersuasive. In that case, the…