LOCKETT
v.
ARN, SUPERINTENDENT, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN
LOCKETT
ARN, SUPERINTENDENT, OHIO REFORMATORY FOR WOMEN
478 U.S. 1019
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Pennsylvania v. Ritchie, 480 U.S. 39 (U.S. 1987)
-
Johnson v. Transp. Agency, 480 U.S. 616 (U.S. 1987)…a right-to-sue letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), held that respondent had violated Title VII. App. to Pet. for Cert. la. The Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed. 770 F. 2d 752 (1985). We granted certiorari, 478 U. S. 1019 (1986). We affirm.2 I A In December 1978, the Santa Clara County Transit District Board of Supervisors adopted an Affirmative Action Plan (Plan) for the County Transportation Agency. The Plan implemented a County Affirmative Action Plan, which ha…
-
United States v. Paradise, 480 U.S. 149 (U.S. 1987)…lief awarded was deemed to “exten[d] no further than necessary to accomplish the objective of remedying the ‘egregious [*166]’ and longstanding racial imbalances in the upper ranks of the Department.” 767 F. 2d, at 1532-1533. We granted certiorari. 478 U. S. 1019 (1986). We affirm. II The United States maintains that the race-conscious relief ordered in this case violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States.16 It is now well established that gov…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence