BERRY

v.

PHELPS, SECRETARY, LOUISIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Thriftway Co. v. The United States Dep't OF Energy, 867 F.2d 1577 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1989)
  …ERC’s final decision is AFFIRMED. . The Entitlements Program has been described in several published opinions. See Texaco, Inc. v. Department of Energy, 795 F. 2d 1021 (TECA 1986), cert. dismissed Texaco, Inc. v. United States Department of Energy, 478 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 10, 92 L.Ed.2d 766 (1986); Husky Oil Company v. Department of Energy, 582 F. 2d 644 (TECA 1978); Delta Refining Co. v. Federal Energy Administration, 559 F. 2d 1190 (TECA 1977). In brief summary: The entitlements program was designed to…
• United States v. State OF Or., 913 F.2d 576 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …eral officials who signed it. We review a district court’s denial of a motion to intervene as of right de novo, United States v. Stringfellow, 783 F. 2d 821, 825 (9th Cir.1986), cert. dismissed sub nom. Stringfellow v. Concerned Neighbors in Action, 478 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 10, 92 L.Ed.2d 765 (1968), except the question of timeliness, which is reviewed for abuse of discretion. NAACP v. New York, 413 U.S. 345, 366, 93 S.Ct. 2591, 2603, 37 L.Ed.2d 648 (1973); United States v. Oregon, 745 F. 2d at 552. [*588] 1…
• In re the Dep't OF Energy Stripper Well Exemption Litig. United States Dep't OF Energy v. "THE States", 855 F.2d 865 (Temp. Emer. Ct. App. 1988)
  …28, 1984, when DOE issued a final decision that the public interest would be best served if DOE did not issue any further entitlements notices. 49 Fed. Reg. 27410 (1984). See Texaco, Inc. v. DOE, 795 F. 2d 1021 (Temp.Emer.Ct.App.), cert. dismissed, 478 U.S. 1030, 107 S.Ct. 10, 92 L.Ed.2d 766 (1986) (after challenges by some refiners, the DOE’s decision was upheld by this court; petition for certiorari was dismissed pursuant to the Final Settlement Agreement in the Stripper Well case). The DOE then announced…

  ← 1 / 2 →