DIGICOURSE, INC.

v.

AMA DISTRIBUTORS, INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (15 total)

• United States v. Laszlo Pomazi, 851 F.2d 244 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …. If disputed, the terms of the agreement will be determined by objective standards.” United States v. Travis, 735 F. 2d 1129, 1132 (9th Cir.1984) (quotations and citation omitted). In United States v. Kamer, 781 F. 2d 1380 (9th Cir.), cert. denied 479 U.S. 819, 107 S.Ct. 80, 93 L.Ed.2d 35 (1986), we held that imposition of over one million dollars in restitution was “material enough” to demand express inclusion in the plea agreement, and failure to do so amounted to a breach of the agreement. Kamer, 781 F…
• United States v. Dario Restrepo, 903 F.2d 648 (9th Cir. 1990)
  …ping all other counts, and then use the behavior underlying the dropped counts to increase dramatically the sentence, unless specifically foreclosed by the plea agreement. See United States v. Kamer, 781 F. 2d 1380, 1386-87 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 819, 107 S.Ct. 80, 93 L.Ed.2d 35 (1986) (sentence imposed must comport with sentence bargained for).3 Restrepo’s case is instructive. He was convicted of two counts of possession of cocaine with intent to distribute, but was sentenced based on a drug q…
• United States v. Sharp, 941 F.2d 811 (9th Cir. 1991)
  …ary depending on the particular facts of the situation, the complexity of the charges, the personal characteristics of the defendant, and whether the defendant was represented by counsel. U.S. v. Kamer, 781 F. 2d 1380, 1384 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 819, 107 S.Ct. 80, 93 L.Ed.2d 35 (1986). Here, at the district court’s request, the prosecutor explained the nature of the charges to Sharp at both plea hearings. The government’s explanation went beyond the mere reading of the indictment and, according…