MARABLE

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Garrido v. Burger King Corp., 558 So. 2d 79 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)
  …as embodied in Garrido’s advertising materials. The elements required to prove each of these claims are not qualitatively different from those required to prove copyright infringement. See Ehat v. Tanner, 780 F. 2d 876 (10th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 820, 107 S.Ct. 86, 93 L.Ed.2d 39 (1986); Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enters., 723 F. 2d 195 (2d Cir. 1983), rev’d on other grounds, 471 U.S. 539, 105 S.Ct. 2218, 85 L.Ed.2d 588 (1985); Crow v. Wainwright, 720 F. 2d at 1224. b. Misappropriat…
• GTE Directories Publ'g Corp. v. Trimen Am., Inc., 67 F.3d 1563 (11th Cir. 1995)
  …plaint or Amended Complaint GTEDPC had contacted Trimen’s clients. A case or controversy must exist at the time the declaratory judgment action is filed. Indium Corp. of America v. Semi-Alloys, Inc., 781 F. 2d 879, 883 (Fed.Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 820, 107 S.Ct. 84, 93 L.Ed.2d 37 (1986); Luis v. Dennis, 751 F. 2d 604, 608 (3rd Cir.1984); Super Products Corp. v. DP Way Corp., 546 F. 2d 748, 752 (7th Cir.1976); See Emory v. Peeler, 756 F. 2d 1547, 1552 (11th Cir.1985). Trimen’s admissions that GTE…
• The Laitram Corp. & Intralox, Inc. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Co., 863 F.2d 855 (Fed. Cir. 1988)
  …nd upheld the validity of the patents, found each infringed, and enjoined further infringement. Laitram Corp. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Co., 226 USPQ 289 (D.Md.1985), aff'd in part, rev’d in part, 785 F. 2d 292, 228 USPQ 935 (Fed. Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 820, 107 S.Ct. 85, 93 L.Ed.2d 39 (1986) (the first trial). In a thorough and comprehensive opinion, the court outlined CWC’s failed effort to obtain rights to the patented invention through merger, acquisition, or joint venture, followed by CWC’s engage…