MIDDLETON ET AL.

v.

CALIFORNIA ET AL.

Citator

Cited By (13 total)

• Williams v. Fla. Parole Comm'n, 625 So. 2d 926 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993)
  …roscriptions do not apply to parole proceedings and that this argument has no colorable merit. See Davis v. Florida Parole and Probation Comm’n, 436 So. 2d 144 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); Jonas v. Wainwright, 779 F. 2d 1576, 1577 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 830, 107 S.Ct. 115, 93 L.Ed.2d 62 (1986); Nunley v. United States Board of Paroles, 439 F.Supp. 887 (W.D.Okla.1977). However, it is not equally clear that the ex post facto argument also lacks colorable merit. In Weaver v. Graham, 450 U.S. 24, 101 S.Ct…
• Roland v. Johnson, 856 F.2d 764 (6th Cir. 1988)
  …e has ruled on a summary judgment motion which, according to section 636(b)(1)(B), is a dispositive pretrial motion and one which is subject to de novo review. See Brown v. Wesley’s Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F. 2d 952, 954 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 830, 107 S.Ct. 116, 93 L.Ed.2d 63 (1986); EEOC v. Keco Industries, Inc., 748 F. 2d 1097, 1102 (6th Cir.1984). A summary judgment determination should be distinguished from section 636(b)(1)(A) determinations, which are subject to a clearly erroneous sta…
• Drywall Tapers AND Pointers OF Greater NEW York v. Local 530 OF Operative Plasterers & Cement Masons Int'l Ass'n, 889 F.2d 389 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …Report and Recommendation under the same clearly erroneous standard. Fed.R.Civ.P. 53(e)(2); Wooldridge v. Marlene Indus. Corp., 875 F. 2d 540, 544 (6th Cir.1989); Brown v. Wesley’s Quaker Maid, Inc., 771 F. 2d 952, 954 (6th Cir.1985), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 830, 107 S.Ct. 116, 93 L.Ed.2d 63 (1986). Then, “[t]he findings of [the magistrate], to the extent that the court adopts them, shall be considered as the findings of the court.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 52(a). Violation of the Injunction 1. Local 530 Local 530 m…