SNYDER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Bortnovsky, 879 F.2d 30 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …ted the statements of third persons under no business duty to report”); United States v. Snyder, 787 F. 2d 1429, 1434 (10th Cir.) (affirming exclusion of report because it contained statements of those with no business duty to report), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 836, 107 S.Ct. 134, 93 L.Ed.2d 78 (1986); United States v. Pazsint, 703 F. 2d 420, 424 (9th Cir.1983) (holding tapes of emergency calls were erroneously admitted because the callers were under no business duty to report); Clark v. City of Los Angeles, 6…
• United States v. Hojatollah Tajeddini, 945 F.2d 458 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …r’s charges and Kara-bolout’s statement — would remain inadmissible hearsay. See, e.g., United States v. Snyder, 787 F. 2d 1429, 1433-34 (10th Cir.) (portion of investigative report recounting third persons’ statements not admissible), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 836, 107 S.Ct. 134, 93 L.Ed.2d 78 (1986); United States v. Smith, [*465] 521 F. 2d 957, 964-65 (D.C.Cir.1975) (statement of complaining witness contained in police report is hearsay and is not admissible under the business records exception); Ramrattan…
• United States v. Casoni, 950 F.2d 893 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …ess. The evidence was merely cumulative.... Id. at 1143. Casoni says the Seventh Circuit’s dictum concerning admission of an attorney’s memo has no application here. He cites United States v. Snyder, 787 F. 2d 1429, 1434 (10th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 836, 107 S.Ct. 134, 93 L.Ed.2d 78 (1986). In Snyder, the court held that an investigating officer’s written report that contained statements by inmates was not a business record. Because the business records exception is “based on a presumption of acc…