REEVES

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Robinson, 857 F.2d 1006 (5th Cir. 1988)
  …ith the meaning of § 924(c)(1). See 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)(2). Possession of a firearm can constitute the requisite use, if the possession is “an integral part of the felony.” United States v. Breckenridge, 782 F. 2d 1317, 1323 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 837, 107 S.Ct. 136, 93 L.Ed.2d 79 (1986); see also United States v. Mason, 658 F. 2d 1263, 1270-71 (9th Cir.1981). Robinson maintains that there is no evidence that he ever had a gun. He also contends that the government offered no proof of ownership o…
• United States v. Meggett, 875 F.2d 24 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …en brandished or even displayed, they were an “integral part” of the operation and “the presence of the guns facilitated the illegal transaction.” Id. at 1271. See also United States v. Breckenridge, 782 F. 2d 1317, 1322-23 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 837, 107 S.Ct. 136, 93 L.Ed.2d 79 (1986) (approving a jury instruction defining “use” under § 924(c)(1) as possession of a gun in a manner which is an “integral part of the felony”). United States v. LaGuardia, 774 F. 2d 317 (8th Cir.1985), was a case…
• Sammons v. Maury Taylor, 967 F.2d 1533 (11th Cir. 1992)
  …irst place. Sammons cites to several Circuit Court opinions handed down before Bertine and several District Court opinions filed after Bertine in support of that contention. See United States v. Brown, 787 F. 2d 929, 931-32 (4th Cir.), cert, denied, 479 U.S. 837, 107 S.Ct. 137, 93 L.Ed.2d 80 (1986); United States v. Pappas, 735 F. 2d 1232, 1234 (10th Cir.1984); United States v. Maher, 724 F.Supp. 1348, 1356 (D.Wyo.1989), rev’d on other grounds, 919 F. 2d 1482 (10th Cir.1990); United States v. Ibarra, 725 F.…