CARDALL

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Stevens, 935 F.2d 1380 (3d Cir. 1991)
  …t trial testimony. See, e.g., United States v. Stockton, 788 F. 2d 210, 219-20 (4th Cir.) (government permitted to impeach witness’s trial testimony by introducing into evidence her prior inconsistent statements before the grand jury), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840, 107 S.Ct. 147, 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). We also think that Stevens exaggerates a bit Congress’s confidentiality concerns. For example, section 3153(c)(2)(C) creates an exception to the confidentiality requirement that requires a PSO to disclose infor…
• Sammie Lee Gordon v. Nagle, 2 F.3d 385 (11th Cir. 1993)
  …are procedurally barred. A defendant has the burden of establishing cause and prejudice, but the state has the burden of demonstrating that a procedural default has occurred. See Nichols v. Wainwright, 783 F. 2d 1540, 1542 (11th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840, 107 S.Ct. 145, 93 L.Ed.2d 87 (1986). When, as in this case, there is no state court decision saying that defendant’s claims are procedurally barred but the state nevertheless asserts procedural default, it is proper for the federal court, as part…
• United States v. Floyd, 882 F.2d 235 (7th Cir. 1989)
  …a § 501(c) violation if the defendant appropriated union property, in the absence of either actual union authorization or a good faith belief that the action was authorized. See United States v. Stockton, 788 F. 2d 210, 217 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 840, 107 S.Ct. 147, 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986); United States v. Sullivan, 498 F. 2d 146, 152 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 419 U.S. 993, 95 S.Ct. 303, 42 L.Ed.2d 265 (1974); but see Colella v. United States, 360 F. 2d 792, 804 (1st Cir.) (no violation if taking…