VESAY

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• Garrison v. State, 553 So. 2d 1377 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)
  …e defendant himself sold the machines at only half price. The issue, however, is not the measure of the benefit received by the defendant, but rather the loss sustained by the victim. United States v. Anglian, 784 F. 2d 765 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841, 107 S.Ct. 148, 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). We recognize that the victim’s restitution cannot exceed the amount of damage caused directly or indirectly by the criminal offense. Fresneda v. State, 347 So. 2d 1021 (Fla.1977); Wilson. Assuming that the vict…
• United States v. Cloud, 872 F.2d 846 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …ontinental’s losses.13 Some courts have indicated that relative degree of responsibility may be an appropriate factor to consider when imposing restitution obligations. See e.g., United States v. Anglian, 784 F. 2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841, 107 S.Ct. 148, 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). It is not, however, among those Congress has mandated in section 3664(a) for consideration by the district court. We reject Cloud’s argument that the district court abused its discretion by failing to consider h…
• United States v. Ryan, 874 F.2d 1052 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …elative degrees of responsibility of co-defendants in imposing restitution obligations but this is not a necessary factor either as a constitutional or statutory requirement. See United States v. Anglian, 784 F. 2d 765, 768 (6th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 841, 107 S.Ct. 148, 93 L.Ed.2d 89 (1986). Finding no abuse of discretion, the judgment appealed from is AFFIRMED.…