BARKER

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By

• United States v. Tutino, 883 F.2d 1125 (2d Cir. 1989)
  …nation lie within the discretion of the trial judge. United States v. Blanco, 861 F. 2d 773, 781 (2d Cir.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 109 S.Ct. 1139, 103 L.Ed.2d 200 (1989); United States v. Pedroza, 750 F. 2d 187, 195 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 151, 93 L.Ed.2d 92 (1986). A trial judge’s evidentiary rulings will not be disturbed unless the judge acted “arbitrarily or irrationally.” United States v. Blanco, 861 F. 2d at 781. See also, United States v. Jamil, 707 F. 2d 638, 642 (…
• United States v. Manner, 887 F.2d 317 (D.C. Cir. 1989)
  …are stipulation” would not take intent out of a case in which the defendant offered "rather unusual theories” to explain the course of events. United States v. Pedroza, 750 F. 2d 187, 201 (2d Cir.1984), cert. denied sub nom. Pelaes v. United States, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 151, 93 L.Ed.2d 92 (1986). We need not rely on Pedroza, however, because Leeper’s offers of stipulation and concession were far less unequivocal than Mohel's. Although the circuits remain divided as to whether stipulations or concessions…
• United States v. Arango-Correa, 851 F.2d 54 (2d Cir. 1988)
  …hours or days which would overwhelm the frightened prisoner and vitiate consent. Compare Stawicki v. Israel, 778 F. 2d 380, 383 (7th Cir.1985) (5V2 hour detention including IV2 hour interrogation did not render confession involuntary), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 842, 107 S.Ct. 150, 93 L.Ed.2d 91 (1986) and Shriner v. Wainwright, 715 F. 2d 1452, 1455 (11th Cir.1983) (10-hour detention including five-hour interrogation did not render confession involuntary), cert. denied, 465 U.S. 1051, 104 S.Ct. 1328, 79 L.Ed.2d…

  ← 1 / 2 →