FRAZIN

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (16 total)

• United States v. North, 910 F.2d 843 (D.C. Cir. 1990)
  …45, 107 S.Ct. 1603, 94 L.Ed.2d 789 (1987) (single defendant concedes he filed no tax returns for three years; since only issue is his intent, general unanimity charge sufficed); United States v. Frazin, 780 F. 2d 1461, 1468 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 844, 107 S.Ct. 158, 93 L.Ed.2d 98 (1986) (general instruction suffices when indictment alleges “one unified scheme to defraud”), I do not believe that the trial judge’s refusal to provide a specific unanimity instruction on Count 9 at North’s request wa…
• United States v. Aguon, 851 F.2d 1158 (9th Cir. 1988)
  …d to a jury not affected by [*1170] error as to two of the three Hobbs Act crimes. Viewing the jury instructions as a whole and evaluating the adequacy of the entire charge, United States v. Frazin, 780 F. 2d 1461, 1468 (9th Cir.1986) [cert. denied, 479 U.S. 844, 107 S.Ct. 158, 93 L.Ed.2d 98] we hold that the court committed plain error in the instructions on Counts One, Two and Three. We reverse the conviction on each of these counts. V The Impartiality of the Jury Aguon moved for a new trial alleging…
• United States v. Miller, 874 F.2d 1255 (9th Cir. 1989)
  …ury’s determination. United States v. Washington, 819 F. 2d 221, 226 (9th Cir.1987). We review the language or formulation of specific instructions only for abuse of discretion. United States v. Frazin, 780 F. 2d 1461, 1468 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 844, 107 S.Ct. 158, 93 L.Ed.2d 98 (1986). Miller raises three objections to the jury instructions in this case. First, Miller claims that the trial court erroneously instructed the jury concerning the intent required to convict Miller on the espionage-…