ARTHUR LEE HAMILTON, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
ARTHUR LEE HAMILTON, APPELLANT,
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
219 So. 2d 43
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1969)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
The briefs and record on appeal having been read and given full consideration, and the appellant having failed to demonstrate reversible error, the order of the Circuit Court is affirmed. See Hamilton v. State *44of Florida, 390 F.2d 872 (5th Cir., 1968) and Pierson v. State, 214 So.2d 17 (Fla. App. 1st, 1968).
CARROLL, DONALD K., Acting C. J., and RAWLS and JOHNSON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Huguenot v. State, 230 So. 2d 488 (Fla. 1st DCA 1970)…e charged does not constitute coercion, either physical or psychological, so as to render a guilty plea which is otherwise freely and voluntarily given constitutionally infirm. See Hamilton v. State, 390 F. 2d 872 (5th Cir. 1968); Hamilton v. State, 219 So. 2d 43 (Fla.App. 1st 1969). We think the following excerpt from Dorsey v. Gill, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 9, 148 F. 2d 857 (1945), cert. denied 325 U.S. 890, 65 S.Ct. 1580, 89 L.Ed. 2003, is dispositive of appellant’s contentions in the case at bar: “* * * Everyon…
Authorities Cited
- Pierson v. State, 214 So. 2d 17 (Fla. 1st DCA 1968)
- Hamilton v. State, 390 F.2d 872 (5th Cir. 1968)