DALY

v.

DALY

Citator

Cited By (27 total)

• Celotex Corp. v. Edwards et ux., 514 U.S. 300 (U.S. 1995)
  …37 F. 2d 89, 93 (CA2), cert. denied, 488 U. S. 868 (1988), or “ ‘which will have an adverse impact on the Debtor’s ability to formulate a Chapter 11 plan,’” 128 B. R., at 483, quoting A. H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin, 788 F. 2d 994 (CA4), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 876 (1986). But cf. n. 12, infra. Apparently viewing his own authority as virtually limitless, the Bankruptcy Judge described a general bankruptcy power “to stop ongoing litigation and to prevent peripheral court decisions from dealing with issues . . .…

  ← 1 / 3 →
• In re Lemco Gypsum, Inc. v. Kemira, Inc., 910 F.2d 784 (11th Cir. 1990)
  …3 (5th Cir.1987); Dogpatch Properties, Inc. v. Dogpatch U.S.A., Inc. (In re Dogpatch U.S.A., Inc.), 810 F. 2d 782, 786 (8th Cir.1987); A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin (In re A.H. Robins Co., Inc.), 788 F. 2d 994, 1002 n. 11 (4th Cir.) cert. denied 479 U.S. 876, 107 S.Ct. 251, 93 L.Ed.2d 177 (1986). The Second, Sixth, and Seventh Circuits have adopted a more restrictive form of the Pacor test. Their formulations may deny jurisdiction in cases where the dispute’s probable effect on the debt- or’s estate, wh…
• In re A.H. Robins Co. v. Mabey, 880 F.2d 694 (4th Cir. 1989)
  …riving at its estimate deserves mention. The challenged findings are based on an estimation process that the district court undertook as a result of our decision in A.H. Robins Co., Inc. v. Piccinin, 788 F. 2d 994, 1013 (4th Cir.1986), cert. denied 479 U.S. 876, 107 S.Ct. 251, 93 L.Ed.2d 177 (1986). In Piccinin, we stated that due to the large number of unliquidated claims that if each claim was tried the process itself “would likely consume all the assets of the debtor.” Id. We suggested that the bankrupt…

  ← 1 / 4 →