MAK

v.

UNITED STATES

Citator

Cited By (11 total)

• Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1988)
  …ted States v. Fioravanti, 412 F. 2d 407, 414-420 (CA3), cert. denied sub nom. Panaccione v. United States, 396 U. S. 837 (1969); United States v. Sawyers, 423 F. 2d 1335 (CA4 1970); United States v. Kelly, 783 F. 2d 575, 576-577 (CA5), cert. denied, 479 U. S. 889 (1986); United States v. Scott, 547 F. 2d 334 (CA6 1977); United States v. Silvern, 484 F. 2d 879 (CA7 1973) (en banc); Potter v. United States, 691 F. 2d 1275 (CA8 1982); United States v. Bonam, 772 F. 2d 1449, 1450 (CA9 1985); United States v. McK…
• United States v. Lindell, 881 F.2d 1313 (5th Cir. 1989)
  …18 (5th Cir.1973)). The charge used by the trial court meets the first criteria; it comports with modified Allen charge language repeatedly approved by this Court.12 See, e.g., United States v. Kelly, 783 F. 2d 575, 576-77 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 889, 107 S.Ct. 288, 93 L.Ed.2d 262 (1986); United States v. Anderton, 679 F. 2d 1199, 1203 n. 3 (5th Cir.1982); United States v. Bottom, 638 F. 2d at 786. In evaluating the “totality of the circumstances” surrounding the use of the charge, we proceed o…
• United States v. Fabio Rodriguez Cortes, 949 F.2d 532 (1st Cir. 1991)
  …16, 75 L.Ed.2d 610 (1983), and only “unreasonable and arbitrary insistence upon expeditiousness in the face of a justifiable request for delay” constitutes an abuse of discretion. United States v. Torres, 793 F. 2d 436, 440 (1st Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 889, 107 S.Ct. 287, 93 L.Ed.2d 262 (1986). Factors that may be relevant in deciding whether the trial court abused its discretion include: “(1) the amount of time available for preparation, (2) the likelihood of prejudice for the denial, (3) the defenda…