WILLIAMS
v.
LEEKE, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.
WILLIAMS
LEEKE, COMMISSIONER, SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, ET AL.
479 U.S. 889
Supreme Court of the United States (1986)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
United States v. Veltmann, 6 F.3d 1483 (11th Cir. 1993)…hen offered against the de-clarant. United States v. Jenkins, 785 F. 2d 1387, 1393 (9th Cir.1986), cert. denied sub nom., Prock v. United States, 479 U.S. 855, 107 S.Ct. 192, 93 L.Ed.2d 125 (1986), and cert. denied sub nom., White v. United States, 479 U.S. 889, 107 S.Ct. 288, 93 L.Ed.2d 262 (1986). Unquestionably, the deposition at. issue was given in proceedings arising from the fire at the Veltmann .home on January 7th. Although the trial- court correctly held that the deposition contained admissions…
-
United States v. Kamel Kamel and Musa Khabbas, 965 F.2d 484 (7th Cir. 1992)…er for a second chance for acquittal. See United States v. Streich, 759 F. 2d 579, 587 (7th Cir.), cert. denied, 474 U.S. 860, 106 S.Ct. 172, 88 L.Ed.2d 142 (1985); see also United States v. Boschetti, 794 F. 2d 416, 419-20 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 889, 107 S.Ct. 289, 93 L.Ed.2d 263 (1986). Mr. Kamel undertook little or no effort, prior to his trial, to obtain the evidence that he now seeks to offer in his defense. In the absence of such steps, we conclude that Mr. Kamel has not shown the requisit…
-
Luc Adras v. Nelson, 917 F.2d 1552 (11th Cir. 1990)…ans lack a constitutional liberty interest, we need not reach the question of whether the Attorney General’s plan satisfies due process, (footnote omitted) In Garcia-Mir v. Meese, 788 F. 2d 1446 (11th Cir.1986), cert. den., Ferrer-Mazorra v. Meese, 479 U.S. 889, 107 S.Ct. 289, 93 L.Ed.2d 263 (1986), this circuit ruled that unadmitted Mariel Cuban aliens, who sought parole revocation hearings, had no right to the protection of the Due Process Clause of the constitution, (“the right to such hearings is not r…